| |
HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF VIRGINIA,
Fortress Monroe, August 8, 1861.
SIR: I have the honor to report that the First Vermont Regiment were
embarked on Monday morning for New Haven, their time expiring on the 9th
instant, which would be the time of their arrival. I had arranged that
Colonel Carr's regiment, the Second New York Volunteers, should be
transferred from Old Point to strengthen Newport News.
You may remember that I said to you, when I had the honor of an
interview at Washington on Saturday, that a demonstration on the part of
the enemy would be made within the coming week. On my return, Tuesday
morning, I found various indications thereof. On Wednesday, about 2
o'clock p.m., the patrol of Colonel Weber's regiment discovered the enemy
in force at New Market Bridge, about 2½ miles from Hampton. About 4
o'clock they took one Mayhew, a deserter, who had swum the creek near New
Market Bridge and delivered himself up, and brought him to me for
examination. From his statements I learned his name, Mayhew; that he is a
native of Bangor, Me., who, having landed in Georgia as a seaman, was
impressed in a Georgia regiment, known by the name of "Baker's Fire
Eaters." He is intelligent, and appears to be truthful. He stated that
five regiments, including two Louisiana; one Alabama regiment, under
Colonel Ex-Governor Winston; one North Carolina and one Georgia regiment,
with two portions of battalions of artillery, and 300 Louisiana Zouaves, a
picked battalion, left Yorktown and Williamsburg on Sunday, and marched to
the neighborhood of Big Bethel, where they encamped until Tuesday. On
Wednesday, at 11 o'clock, they marched to New Market Bridge, where they
formed in order of battle, expecting an attack from me. They had eight
guns; one rifled gun, two 32-pounder howitzers, two long 24s, and three
smaller guns. This force was under the command of General Magruder. The
regiments had numbered in the neighborhood of 1,000 men each, but had been
reduced by sickness at Yorktown; Mayhew's own regiment numbering but 650,
325 being sick with the measles. As near as I could gather,
comparing his account with the notes I had from others, the enemy's force
was a little rising 5,000 men, although Mayhew represented it at 7,000. He
further stated that it was understood in camp that an attack was to be
made on Newport News, the force being then bivouacked but 5 miles from
that point.
Dispositions were immediately made, such as seemed proper, for
re-enforcing Newport News in case of an attack, or repelling an attack
upon the troops encamped between the fortress and Hampton in case one was
made. After riding through the camps and giving final instructions, I rode
over to the bridge at Hampton, 30 feet of which nearest the town we had
before removed, and at 11.20 o'clock, when I left, everything was still. A
few minutes before 12 o'clock the enemy made an attempt to burn the
bridge, and for that purpose attacked the guard thereon, who were
protected by a barricade of planks. The enemy were driven back with
the loss of 3 killed and several wounded. No casualties occurred on our
side.
The enemy then proceeded to fire the town in a great number of places.
By 12 o'clock it was in flames, and is now entirely destroyed. They gave
but fifteen minutes' time for the inhabitants to remove from their houses,
and I have to-day brought over the old and infirm, who by that wanton act
of destruction are now left houseless and homeless. The enemy took away
with them most of the able-bodied white men.
A more wanton and unnecessary act than the burning, as it seems to me,
could not have been committed. There was not the slightest attempt to make
any resistance on our part to the possession of the town, which we had
before evacuated, as you were informed by my last dispatch. There was no
attempt to interfere with them there, as we only repelled an attempt to
burn the bridge. It would have been easy to dislodge them from the town by
a few shells from the fortress, but I did not choose to allow an
opportunity to fasten upon the Federal troops any portion in this
heathenish outrage.
The town was the property of the secession inhabitants of Virginia,
and they and their friends have chosen deliberately to destroy it, and
under circumstances of cruel indifference to the inhabitants, who had
remained in their homes, entirely without parallel. Indeed, for two months
past, since Hampton has been within the power of my troops, and during the
month that we occupied it, every exertion was used by me to protect the
property from spoliation and the inhabitants from outrage, and I can
safely say that $100 would cover all the damage done there in occupied
houses. That there has been some appropriation of furniture by the troops
from unoccupied houses is most true, but it had been substantially all
taken from them and stored in the Seminary building. I knew this course
would meet the approval of the Commanding General, but in a single hour
the rebel army devoted to indiscriminate destruction both public and
private buildings, the church and the court-house, as well as the cottage
of the widow.
I confess myself so poor a soldier as not to be able to discern
the strategical importance of this movement. I had fortified the
churchyard with earth embankments, which were not destroyed by the fire,
while the hymn of praise and the voice of prayer went up in the church on
the last Sabbath of its occupation by Massachusetts troops. The poor
citizens were told by their friends that this destruction was to prevent
the use of their village as winter quarters for our troops. But I am sure
it never entered my mind, and, I take leave to believe, the mind of the
Commanding General, that there was the furthest intention of wintering any
portion of the Federal troops at this point outside the garrison. We had
believed that we were to follow the track of our Northern birds southward
with the approach of frost.
No demonstration was made by the enemy save the burning of a
deserted village, and to-day nothing has been done by the enemy except to
withdraw his troops across New Market Bridge. I regret the military
necessity, to which I yield the cordial recognition of my judgment, which
called for the withdrawal of the four regiments and a half, which caused
the evacuation of Hampton; not for our sakes, but because of the loss
which has thereby been brought upon the inhabitants. This act upon
the part of the enemy seems to me to be a representative one, showing the
spirit in which the war is to be carried on on their part, and which
perhaps will have a tendency to provoke a corrresponding spirit upon our
part, but we may hope not.
Most respectfully, your obedient servant,
BENJ. F. BUTLER,
Major-General, Commanding.
Lieutenant-General SCOTT,
Commanding, &c.
**************************
- AUGUST 7,
1861.--The burning of Hampton, Virginia.
Report
of Col. John W. Phelps, First Vermont Infantry.
August
11, 1861.
- AUGUST 7,
1861.--The burning of Hampton, Virginia.
Reports
of Brig. Gen. John B. Magruder, C. S. Army.
August
2 [?],
1861.
- AUGUST 7,
1861.--The burning of Hampton, Virginia.
Reports
of Brig. Gen. John B. Magruder, C. S. Army.
August
9,
1861.
|
|